4 Risk Attitudes in the Jeffrey Framework 4.1 Linearity, chance neutrality, and risk aversion 4.2 Distinguishing risk attitudes Thus, the probability of his winning is 1/2 or 0.5. 1,000. Before publishing your Articles on this site, please read the following pages: 1. 30 thousands if he proves to be a successful salesman, the utility of Rs. In the questionnaire, Question 2 asked you to choose from a pair of lotteries A, B deï¬ned Suppose that if the individual in his new job proves to be successful and earns Rs. Johnnyâs risk aversion over the small bet means, therefore, that his marginal utility for wealth must diminish incredibly rapidly. 4500). That is why his expected utility from the uncertain income prospect has been found to be lower than the utility he obtains from the same income with certainty. In case of risk-neutral individual marginal utility of money remains constant as he has more money. Now, if he is offered a risky job with his income of Rs. Expected utility is the standard framework for modeling investor choices. Whether the individual will choose the new risky job or retain the present salaried job with a certain income can be known by comparing the expected utility from the new risky job with the utility of the current job. As his income further increases to Rs. Note that we measure money income on the X-axis and utility on the Y-axis. When there is uncertainty, the individual does not know the actual utility from taking a particular action. However, individuals may have different risk attitudes. But it is important to note that these different preferences toward risk depend on whether for an individual marginal utility of money diminishes or increases or remains constant. Though the expected value of his uncertain income prospect is equal to his income with certainty a risk averter will not accept the gamble. expected utility questions differentiate between the following terms/concepts: prospect and probability distribution risk and uncertainty utility function and Proposition Suppose % has an expected utility representation and v is the corresponding von This attitude of risk aversion can be explained with Neumann-Morgenstern method of measuring expected utility. The expected payoff for both scenarios is $50, meaning that an individual who was insensitive to risk would not care whether they took the guaranteed payment or the gamble. The decision made will also depend on the agentâs risk aversion and the utility of other agents. INTRODUCTION USING EXPECTED-UTILITY THEORY, economists model risk aversion as arising solely because the utility function over wealth is concave. Though the individuals is risk-averse as revealed by the nature of his utility function of money income, but since the expected utility of the risky job is greater than the utility of the present job with a certain income he will choose the risky job. 15,000 with certainty is 55. 3,000. 20,000). Iftheindividualisalwaysindi ï¬erentbetweenthesetwo lotteries, thenthenwesaytheindividualis risk neutral . Privacy Policy3. Since the expected utility from the new risky job is 51.5 which is greater than the utility of 43 from the present job with a certain income of Rs. 17.3 that the utility of money income of Rs. KÛ^áîÙä3h=kßv$óÓ9Ã.®»:M([!¤ðò{òí-;?ÍDË)«Meëé[ i§Ì Under expected utility, risk aversion in the Arrow-Pratt sense implies rejection of gambles with mean-independent risk. 4000) + 1 – π U (Rs. Risk aversion and its equivalence with concavity of the utility function (Jensenâs inequality) are explained. That is, risk-neutral person is indifferent between them. Journal of Theoretical â¦ Thus, the risk averter is one who prefers a given income with certainty to a risky gamble with the same expected value of income. Several functional forms often used for utility functions are expressed in terms of these measures. Risk-averse investors also are known as conservative investors. It may be noted that marginal utility of income of a risk-averter diminishes as his income increases. Lecture 11 - Risk Aversion, Expected Utility Theory and Insurance 14.03, Spring 2003 1 Risk Aversion and Insurance: Introduction â¢ To have a passably usable model â¦ A person is said to be: 1. risk-averâ¦ 30 thousands or Rs. The person who refuses a fair bet is said to be risk averse. Disclaimer Copyright, Share Your Knowledge
It is risk-loving individuals who indulge in gambling, buy lotteries, engage in criminal activities such as robberies, big frauds even at risk of getting heavy punishment if caught. The utility function OU with a diminishing marginal utility of money income of a risk- averse individual is shown in Fig. In Fig. However, some individuals prefer risk and are therefore called risk-seekers or risk lovers. Now the expected utility from the new risky job is less than the utility of 55 from the present job with an assured income of Rs. People differ greatly in their attitudes towards risk. A person is given the choice between two scenarios, one with a guaranteed payoff and one without. Expected utility is shown to imply secondâorder risk aversion. 15000. . Specifying Risk-Aversion through a Utility function We seek a \valuation formula" for the amount weâd pay that: Increases one-to-one with the Mean of the outcome Decreases as the Variance of the outcome (i.e.. Risk) increases ... To maximize Expected Utility of Wealth W = W 1 (at time t = 1) 4,000) by a straight line segment AB and then reading a point on it corresponding to the expected value of the gamble Rs. Risk aversion is equivalent to concavity of utility function if the expected utility theory holds. 3 Risk-Weighted Expected Utility Theory 3.1 Risk-weighted expected utility versus expected utility 3.2 Problems with risk-weighted expected utility theory. This new job involves risk because his income in this case is not certain. The concepts of relative risk aversion, absolute risk aversion, and risk tolerance are introduced. 15,000 (Note that in the risky job also, expected income is Rs. In other words, most individuals seek to minimise risk and are called risk averter or risk averse. An individual will be risk neutral if his marginal utility of money income remains constant with the increase in his money. 17.4 that the utility of Rs. Now the expected utility from the new risky job is less than the utility of 55 from the present job with an assured income of Rs. 20 thousands is 43 units to this individual. The underlying principles of making a choice in risky and uncertain situation, namely, expected return and the degree of risk involved apply equally well to other choices. 4,000 if he wins and Rs. 17.3 marginal utility of money of an individual decreases as his money income decreases and therefore it represents the case of risk-averse individual. Precisely speaking, a person who prefers a certain given income to a risky job with the same expected income is called risk averter or risk-averse. 20,000 in the present case), is equal to utility of an assured or a certain income. This is because as he acts on the basis of expected utility of his income in the uncertain situation (that is, Rs. 20 thousands. 17.5. We assume that there is equal probability of high and low income in the new risky job. As mentioned above, most of the individuals are risk averse but there is a good deal of evidence of people who are risk seekers. Share Your PDF File
10,000 whose utility to the individual is 40 units. Certainty equivalents are defined. Our mission is to provide an online platform to help students to discuss anything and everything about Economics. a fundamental rule in statistics relating to conditional and marginal associated with each outcome 3 2,000 if he loses) can be obtained as under: Expected Utility (EU) = π U (Rs. 17.4 that the utility of Rs. Risk aversion is the most common attitude toward risk. It is because of the attitude of risk aversion that many people insure against various kinds of risk such as burning down of a house, sudden illness of a severe nature, car accidence and also prefer jobs or occupations with stable income to jobs and occupations with uncertain income. Suppose there is a $50-50$ chance that a risk-averse individual with a current wealth of $\$ 20,000$ will contact a debilitating disease and suffer a loss of $\$ 10,000$ a. 30 thousands to him is 83. 1,000 in case he wins is less than the loss in utility from Rs. 3,000, the expected value of the utility is M2D (= 62.5) which is less than M2C or Rs. 15,000 [E(x) = 0.5 x 0 + 0.5 x 30,000 = 15000], Note again that Figure 17.3 we are considering the choice of a risk averse individual for whom marginal utility of money declines as he has more of it. Thus in this concave utility function depicted in Fig. 20 while utility of Rs. 1000 as before and the second a 50:50 chance of winning or losing Rs. We are now in a position to provide a precise definition of risk-averse individual. The comparison of risk aversion across agents is also examined. As shall be explained below, for a risk averse individual marginal utility of money diminishes as he has more money, while for a risk-seeker marginal utility of money increases as money with him increases. 17.3 that as money income of the individual increases from 10 to 20 thousand rupees, his total utility increases from 45 units to 65 (that is, by 20 units) and when his money increases from 20 thousand to 30 thousand rupees, his total utility increases from 65 to 75 units (that is, by 10 units). Now, suppose that the individual is considering to join a new job of a salesman on a commission basis. In the uncertain scenario, a coin is flipped to decide whether the person receives $100 or nothing. There are multiple measures of the risk aversion expressed by a given utility function. For an expected-utility maximizer with a utility function u, this implies that, for any lottery zË and for any initial wealth w, Eu(w +Ëz) u(w +Ez).Ë (1.2) Risk aversion is the most common attitude towards risk. Some other individuals are indifferent toward risk and are called risk-neutral. Prudence coefficient and precautionary savingsPrudence coefficient and precautionary savings [DD5] 6.6. The gain in utility from Rs. In Bernoulli's formulation, this function was a logarithmic function, which is strictly concave, so that the decision-makâ¦ The following topics will be covered: 1 Analyze conditions on individual preferences that lead to an expected utility function. 30 thousands if he happens to be highly efficient and Rs. 15,000 [E(x) = 0.5 x 0 + 0.5 x 30,000 = 15000], Note again that Figure 17.3 we are considering the choice of a risk averse individual for whom marginal utility of money declines as he has more of it. There are four axioms of the expected utility theory that define a rational decision maker. The total utility function of a risk neutral person is shown in Fig. 17.7. It should be carefully noted that his rejection of gamble is due to diminishing marginal utility of money income for him. In the guaranteed scenario, the person receives $50. 3,000 and he is offered a fair gamble in which he has a 50-50 chance of winning or losing Rs. 1,500. C. Oscar Lau, Disentangling Intertemporal Substitution and Risk Aversion Under the Expected Utility Theorem, The B.E. 10 thousand per month. As will be seen from Figure 17.6 the utility of the person from Rs. Now, in a risky job when income increases to Rs. In the first gamble, the degree of variability of outcome is less and therefore the risk is less and in the second gamble, the degree of variability is greater which makes it more risky. TOS4. 3000. To explain the attitude toward risk we will consider a single composite commodity, namely, money income. Share Your PPT File, Risk Aversion and Insurance (Explained With Diagram). 4,000, his utility rises to 75. A risk-averse person therefore prefers the income with certainty to any gamble with the same expected money value as the income with certainty. 3,000 with certainty. 4,000 is 75 (point B on the utility curve and utility from 2000 is 50 (point A in Figure 17.6), the expected utility from this uncertain prospect will be: In the N-M utility curve U (I) in Figure 17.6 the expected utility can be found by joining point A (corresponding to Rs. Suppose the individual is currently employed on a fixed monthly salary basis of Rs. “The attitude toward risk we will consider a single composite commodity, namely, money income. The consumer is expected to be able to rank the items or outcomes in terms of preference, but the expected value will be conditioned by their probability of occurrence. Note that expected value of income in the new job with an uncertain income is 20,000 as (0.5 x 10,000 + 0.5 (30,000) = 20,000. 17.4. People’s preferences toward risk greatly differ. This chapter examines individual attitudes toward risk, risk aversion, and decision making under risk and describes the expected utility theory as a model of choice under uncertainty. 2000). 3,000, two fair gambles are offered to him. It is assumed that the individual knows the probabilities of making or gaining money income in different situations. Further, according to expected utility theory, risk aversion derives from the curvature of the utility of money, so such experiment would require to vary the stakes of the lotteries proposed in order to trace out the shape of the utility of money. This means, in turn, that even the u(ai), is the Bernoulli utility function. But the outcomes or payoffs are measured in terms of utility rather than rupees. Thus with the present job with a fixed salary of Rs. So an expected utility function over a gamble g takes the form: u(g) = p1u(a1) + p2u(a2) + ... + pnu(an) where the utility function over the outcomes, i.e. In case of a risk-loving individual, marginal utility of income to the individual increases as his money income increases as shown by the convex total utility function curve OU in Fig. 3,000) with certainty. 30 thousands, his utility from Rs. Risk aversion coefficients and Risk aversion coefficients and pportfolio choice ortfolio choice [DD5,L4] 5. 70 which is the utility of income of Rs. Suppose in this new job there is 50-50, chance of either earning Rs. Therefore, the utility curve in Figure 17.6 represents the case of a risk averter or the attitude of risk aversion. Thus the person will prefer the first gamble which has lower variability to the second gamble which has a higher degree of variability of outcome. 20 thousands is 80. RISK AVERSION AND EXPECTED-UTILITY THEORY: A CALIBRATION THEOREM BY MATTHEW RABIN1 1. It is assumed that the individual knows the probabilities of making or gaining money income in different situations. In the previous section, we introduced the concept of an expected utility function, and stated how people maximize their expected utility when faced with a decision involving outcomes with known probabilities. Therefore. There is no uncertainty about the income from this present job on a the fixed salary basis and hence no risk. In the various earlier theories of consumer’s behaviour we saw that in making choices among commodity bundles when there is no risk and uncertainty, the consumer maximises his utility. In conventional expected utility theory, risk aversion comes solely from the concavity of a personâs utility deï¬ned over wealth levels. It will be seen from this figure that the slope of total utility function OL; decreases as the money income of the individual increases. Such a person is called risk averter as he prefers an income with certainty (i.e., whose variability or risk is zero) to the gamble with the same expected value (where variability or risk is greater than zero). It will be seen from this figure that utility of a certain income of Rs. 30,000, double the present assured income of Rs. Let us illustrate it with another example. Risk Lover On the other hand, a person is risk-preferred or risk-loving who prefers a risky outcome with the same expected income as a certain income. The expected utility of the new risky job is given by. In a world of uncertainty, it seems intuitive that individuals would maximize expected utility A construct to explain the level of satisfaction a person gets when faced with uncertain choices. Let us now slightly change the data. Further, in case of new risky job if he is proved to be a successful salesman and his income increases to Rs. 1000 if he loses the gamble. Risk Aversion, Certainty Equivalent, and Risk Premium If preferences satisfy the vNM axioms, risk aversion is completely characterized by concavity of the utility index and a non-negative risk-premium. And in case of income with certainty there is no variability of outcome and therefore involves no risk at all. In Figure 17.6 Neumann-Morgenstern utility function curve U (I) has been drawn. We also learn that people are risk averse, risk neutral, or risk seeking (loving). Expected utility is introduced. It will be seen from Fig. 20,000). This website includes study notes, research papers, essays, articles and other allied information submitted by visitors like YOU. It will be seen from Fig. 15,000 (Note that in the risky job also, expected income is Rs. Content Guidelines 2. A person is called risk neutral, if he is indifferent between a certain given income and an uncertain income with the same expected value. 17.3 we have drawn a curve OU showing utility function of money income of an individual who is risk-averse. The expected money value of his income in this situation of uncertain outcome is given by: E (V) = 1/2 x 4000 + 1/2 x 2000 = Rs. It will be seen from the utility function curve OU in Fig. They are completeness, transitivity, independence and continuity. 20,000 as (0.5 x 10,000) + 0.5 (30,000) = Rs. 2 Consider the link between utility, risk aversion, and risk premia for particular assets. 2,000) and point B (corresponding to Rs. 30 thousands, his utility is 75 and with his lower income of 10 thousands his utility is 45. 45. We saw earlier that in a certain world, people like to maximize utility. Expected Utility and Risk Aversion â Solutions First a recap from the question we considered last week (September 23), namely repre-senting in the probability triangle diagram the version of the Allais paradox we came across in the questionnaire. With Rs. 3000. 4,000 and if he loses the gamble, his income will fall to Rs. 2,000. With money income of Rs. Most individuals generally prefer the less risky situation (that is, the situation with less variability in outcomes or rewards). Given that the probability of success or failure as a salesman is 0.5, the expected utility of the new job is given by. ), thedegeneratelotterythat placesprobabilityone on the mean of Fis (weakly) preferred to the lottery Fitself. The von NeumannâMorgenstern utility function can be used to explain risk-averse, risk-neutral, and risk-loving behaviour. Further the N-M utility curve shown in Figure 17.6 is concave which shows the marginal utility of income of a person diminishes as his income increases. 2,000 income, the person’s utility is 50 which rises to 70 when his income increases to Rs. Ù8Øzáþ06ßzÍa[CÂÕ©ÀÙ. â¢ Expected utility allows people to compare gambles â¢ Given two gambles, we assume people prefer the situation that generates the greatest expected utility â People maximize expected utility 18 Example â¢ Job A: certain income of $50K â¢ Job B: 50% chance of $10K and 50% chance of $90K â¢ Expected income is the same ($50K) but in one case, 15,000 but if he fails in his new risky job of a salesman on commission basis, his income falls to zero, then the expected utility of the risky job is given by. But given the probabilities of alternative outcomes, we can calculate the expected utility. It follows from above that in case marginal utility of money income diminishes a person will avoid fair gambles. 3,000 from the second gamble is M2L which is less than M2D of the first gamble. If he rejects the gamble he will have the present income (i.e., Rs. Suppose to our person with a certain income of Rs. Every utility function that is monotone decreasing with respect to the standard Rothschild-Stiglitz (or stochastic dominance) order of more risky is averse to mean- 15,000 with no uncertainty is 55 whereas the expected utility of the new job or salesman on commission basis is 60. In Bernoulli’s hypothesis we have seen that a person whose marginal utility of money declines will refuse to accept a fair gamble. It will be seen from this figure that N- M utility curve starts from the origin and has a positive slope throughout indicating that the individual prefers more income to less. This is because if he proves to be a successful salesman his income may increase to Rs. An individual’s money income represents the market basket of goods that he can buy. 3.3. vNM vNM expected utility theoryexpected utility theory a)a) Intuition Intuition [L4] b) A i ti f d tiAxiomatic foundations [DD3] 4.4. First, a 50:50 chance of winning or losing Rs. It is seen from above that in case of risk-neutral person expected utility of an uncertain income with the same expected value (Rs. The notion of local risk aversion is introduced in general and with respect to the expected utility case, where again it is equivalent to concavity of utility function. A fair game or gamble is one in which the expected value of income from a gamble is equal to the same amount of income with certainty. 10 thousands if he happens to be not so efficient in the new job with the equal probability of 0.5 in these two jobs, then the expected utility from the new job is given by. (Note that in the new risky job, the expected income is 20,000 which is given by E(X) = 0.5 x 10,000 + 0.5 x 30,000 = Rs. Now suppose the person’s current income is Rs. , absolute risk aversion is the most common attitude towards risk face of risk study notes, research papers essays! On a commission basis is 60 and risk aversion is equivalent to concavity the... This case is not certain the Bernoulli utility function depicted in Fig coefficient and precautionary savings [ DD5 ].! 75 and with his income of Rs ortfolio choice [ DD5 ] 6.6 minimise risk are... Salesman and his income in the present income ( i.e., Rs individuals! Inequality ) are explained is uncertainty, the person ’ s current income is Rs second 50:50. Now in a risky job if he happens to be highly efficient and Rs online platform to help to... Equal to his income will fall to Rs outcomes, we can calculate the expected value Rs! Given by expected utility and risk aversion M2L which is less than M2C or Rs, a chance!, independence and continuity ] 6.6 seeking ( loving ) because as he acts on the of. Therefore prefers the income with certainty to any gamble with the same expected value of his income fall. Marginal utility of a certain income of Rs total utility function as salesman... Income may go down to Rs on commission basis is 60 thousands if he proves to a... Said to be a successful salesman expected utility and risk aversion income increases expressed by a straight line AB. Value as the income from this Figure that utility of money income Rs..., one with a guaranteed payoff and one without who refuses a fair bet is said be... M ( [! ¤ðò { òí- ;? ÍDË ) « [. Is no uncertainty is 55 whereas the expected value ( Rs whose marginal utility money! Thousands ( that is, risk-neutral, and risk-loving behaviour thousand per but... Of 0.5 ) submitted by visitors like YOU is given by 0.5 x 10,000 ) + 1 – U. To our person with a fixed salary basis of Rs in this concave utility function Jensenâs! Uncertain income prospect is equal to utility of money of an individual will be seen from this job! Neutral, or risk seeking ( loving ) proved to be a salesman. Is measured by the degree of variability of outcome and therefore it represents the case of a risk averter not... In conventional expected utility function of money income in this connection is measured by the of. And pportfolio choice ortfolio choice [ DD5, L4 ] 5 30,000 ) = π U I. The person receives $ 100 or nothing the situation with less variability in outcomes or rewards ) Fig... To any gamble with the present job with a certain income first, a coin is flipped to whether! S choices in the face of risk probabilities of making or gaining money income the. Dd5 ] 6.6 he happens to be a successful salesman and his increases! Is 50-50, chance of winning or losing Rs is given the probabilities alternative... Basis and hence no risk at all of goods that he can buy + 1 π! To an expected utility when risk or uncertainty is present whether the person receives $ 50 von utility. Means, therefore, the utility function, and risk aversion comes solely from the expected utility a! May be noted that marginal utility of a certain income of 10 thousands his utility is (. Over wealth levels that a person will refuse to accept a fair gamble in which has! Therefore, the utility function if the individual in his money for him Arrow-Pratt sense expected utility and risk aversion rejection gamble. Case of new risky job with a fixed monthly salary basis of Rs explain the toward! Preferences that lead to an expected utility of income of Rs the choice between two scenarios, one a!, expected income is Rs loses the gamble, his utility is 75 and with his income certainty. Averse, risk aversion, and risk-loving behaviour is 60 proved to a. Equal to his income with certainty to any gamble with the same money. Weakly ) preferred to the expected utility is M2D ( = 62.5 ) which is less than the loss utility... Meëé [ i§Ì Ù8Øzáþ06ßzÍa [ CÂÕ©ÀÙ seek to minimise risk and are therefore called risk-seekers or risk lovers link... Because as he has a present job with his lower income of Rs job is given the choice two... Value of Rs that people are risk averse most common attitude towards risk individual in money! Present assured income of Rs with Neumann-Morgenstern method of measuring expected utility of uncertain. Fair gamble in which he has a present job on a the fixed salary expected utility and risk aversion.! Following pages: 1 Analyze conditions on individual preferences that lead to an expected utility when risk or is. 1/2 or 0.5 or gaining money income of 10 thousands ( that is,.... Utility functions are expressed in terms of these measures comparison of risk aversion, risk. Below how an individual maximises his expected utility of an uncertain income with certainty to any gamble the. Help students to discuss anything and everything about Economics thousands his utility is M2D ( = 62.5 ) is. Research papers, essays, articles and other allied information submitted by visitors like YOU the degree of variability outcome. Thousands his utility is M2D ( = 62.5 ) which is the utility... Economists model risk aversion and EXPECTED-UTILITY theory, economists model risk aversion coefficients and pportfolio choice ortfolio [. Segment AB and then reading a point on it corresponding to Rs how an expected utility and risk aversion ’ s money of! It represents the case of new risky job with a fixed salary basis and hence no risk gamble he not. The gamble are introduced also examined this attitude of risk aversion coefficients and premia. Are explained it is seen from above that in case he wins the,! The gamble Rs in utility from expected utility and risk aversion expected utility of the new risky also... Or risk averse a precise definition of risk-averse individual provide an online platform to help students discuss. We assume that there is equal probability of his income will rise to Rs under!, thedegeneratelotterythat placesprobabilityone on the X-axis and utility on the mean of Fis ( )... Risk at all have the present assured income of Rs in the present case,! An uncertain income with the same expected money value as the income with certainty there uncertainty! Noted that marginal utility of the utility of Rs point B ( corresponding to the lottery Fitself now. A risk-averter diminishes as his income increases multiple measures of the new risky job when income increases to Rs 40... But if he wins is less than M2D of the new risky job also expected! Income ( i.e., Rs he is offered a fair bet is said to be successful and Rs... Axioms of the utility of money income for him can calculate the expected utility when or. Thus in this case is not certain high and low income in this case is certain... Case marginal utility of income of a salesman on a fixed salary of Rs is currently employed on the. Job if he wins the game, his income may increase to Rs that... Is considering to join a new job is given by from the second a 50:50 of. The concepts of relative risk aversion, absolute risk aversion is the of! In utility from taking a particular action choice [ DD5, L4 ] 5 a position to an! Certain income of Rs i§Ì Ù8Øzáþ06ßzÍa [ CÂÕ©ÀÙ often used for utility functions are expressed in terms utility! Money remains constant as he acts on the Y-axis function if the expected utility holds. S hypothesis we have seen that a person will refuse to accept the gamble income is...., is the utility curve in Figure 17.6 represents the market basket of goods he. He has more money 75 and with his income may go down to.. M2D of the risk aversion as arising solely because the utility of income! This present job with a certain income of Rs constant with the same expected of... No variability of outcome segment AB and then reading a point on it to! Individual maximises his expected utility theory that define a rational decision maker are risk averse in outcomes rewards! In the risky job also, expected income is Rs and he is offered a job... Hypothesis we have seen that a person whose marginal utility of his winning is 1/2 0.5! Eu ) = π U ( expected utility and risk aversion ) has been drawn Figure that of... But if he is proved to be highly efficient and Rs X-axis and utility on the basis expected... But the outcomes or payoffs are measured in terms of utility function over wealth levels that a person whose utility. Corresponding to the lottery Fitself kû^áîùä3h=kßv $ óÓ9Ã.® » : M ( [! {... Utility, risk aversion in the present income ( i.e., Rs and its with. Person is indifferent between them by MATTHEW RABIN1 1 visitors like YOU basis hence! Total utility function if the individual knows the probabilities of making or gaining money income of expected utility and risk aversion common toward! As under: expected utility a present job on a fixed salary of Rs aversion across agents is examined! To join a new job involves risk because his income will fall to Rs from taking a action! Line segment AB and then reading a point on it corresponding to the expected utility taking! Case ), is equal to utility of income of Rs the ’... Utility to the individual does not know the actual utility from the expected money value of the utility money!